Transported Joint Probability Density Function Modeling of Turbulent Dilute Spray Flows

Authors

  • Y. Hu Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
  • E. Gutheil Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj186

Abstract

A transported joint probability density function (PDF) model for turbulent spray flows is presented, where a one-point one-time statistical description of the gas-phase mixture fraction and the gas velocity is used. This approach requires the closure of the molecular mixing, which is achieved through use of the extended interaction-by-exchange-with-the-mean (IEM) model and a simplified Langevin model for the closure of the gas velocity both of which are extended through additional terms accounting for spray evaporation. These equations require the solution of the turbulent time scales and the mean pressure field through a Eulerian description. The numerical approach includes a Lagrangian Monte Carlo method for the solution of modeled joint PDF equation with a Eulerian finite-volume algorithm to determine the turbulent time scale and the mean pressure field. For the dispersed liquid phase, Lagrangian equations are used to describe the droplet heating, evaporation, and motion in the framework of a discrete droplet model. The convective droplet evaporation model is employed, and the infinite conductivity model with consideration of non-equilibrium effects based on the Langmuir-Knudsen law is used. The droplet turbulent dispersion is modeled with two different Lagrangian stochastic models. The resulting spray evolution equations are solved by a Lagrangian discrete droplet method using the point source approximation for a dilute spray. The numerical results are compared with experimental data of Gounder et al. [1], where the experimental set B of the acetone spray flows SP2 and SP6 are simulated. Comparison of numerical and experimental results includes droplet size, liquid volume flux as well as the mean and fluctuating velocities. Generally, good agreement is achieved, although the radial droplet dispersion is somewhat under-predicted by the computations. The droplet fluctuating velocities show sensitivity to the different dispersion models.

References

[1]. J.D. Gounder, A. Kourmatzis, and A.R. Masri, Combust. Flame 159 (11) (2012) 3372–3397.

[2]. R. Fox, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 44 (2012) 47–76.

[3]. H.-W. Ge, and E. Gutheil, Atomization and Sprays, 16 (5) (2006) 531–542.

[4]. B. Merci, and E. Gutheil, Experiments and Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Combustion of Diluted Sprays. Springer, Heidelberg, 2014.

[5]. A.R. Masri, and J.D. Gounder, “Details and complexities of boundary conditions in turbulent piloted dilute spray jets and flames”. In Experiments and Numerical Simulations of Diluted Spray Turbulent Combustion,
Merci, B., Roekaerts, D., and Sadiki, A., Eds., Springer, Heidelberg, 2011.

[6]. M. Chrigui, J. Gounder, A. Sadiki, A.R. Masri, and J. Janicka, Combust. Flame 159 (8) (2012) 2718–2741.

[7]. S. De, and S.H. Kim, Combust. Flame 160 (10) (2013) 2048–2066.

[8]. C. Heye, V. Raman, and A.R. Masri, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (1) (2013) 1633–1641.

[9]. H.-W. Ge, Y. Hu, and E. Gutheil, Combust. Sci. Technol. 184(10-11) (2012) 1664–1679.

[10]. R.M. Humza, Y. Hu, and E. Gutheil, “Probability density function modeling of turbulent spray combustion”. In Experiments and Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Combustion of Diluted Sprays. B. Merci and
E. Gutheil, Eds., Springer, Heidelberg, 2014.

[11]. C. Hollmann, and E. Gutheil, Proc. Combust. Inst. 26 (1996) 1731–1738.

[12]. S.B. Pope, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 11 (2) (1985) 119–192.

[13]. H.-W. Ge, and E. Gutheil, Combust. Flame 153 (12) (2008) 173–185.

[14]. L. Schiller, and A.Z. Naumann, “Über die grundlegenden Berechnungen bei der Schwerkraftaufbereitung”. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure 77 (1933) 318–320.

[15]. A.D. Gosman, and E. Ioannides, Journal of Energy 7 (1983) 482–490.

[16]. S. Laín, and M. Sommerfeld, Powder Technol. 184 (1) (2008) 76–88.

[17]. C. Crowe, J.D. Schwarzkopf, M. Sommerfeld, and Y. Tsuji, Multiphase flows with droplets and particles, Second Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2011.

[18]. G. Hubbard, V. Denny, and A. Mills, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 18 (9) (1975) 1003–1008 (1975).

[19]. R. Miller, K. Harstad, and J. Bellan, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 24 (6) (1998) 1025–1055.

[20]. B. Abramzon, and W. Sirignano, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 32 (9) (1989) 1605–1618.

[21]. B.E. Poling, J.M. Prausnitz, and J.P. O'Connell, Properties of Gases and Liquids, Fifth Edition. McGraw-Hill, 2001.

[22]. R. Garg, C. Narayanan, and S. Subramaniam, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 35 (4) (2009) 376–388.

[23]. R. Garg, C. Narayanan, D. Lakehal, and S. Subramaniam, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 33 (12) (2007) 1337–1364.

[24]. D.W. Green, and R.H. Perry, Perry's chemical engineers' handbook, Eighth Edition. McGraw-Hill, 2007.

[25]. X.-Q. Chen, and J.C. Pereira, Numer. Heat Transfer, Part A, 27 (2) (1995) 143–162.

Downloads

Published

2014-09-30

How to Cite

Hu, Y., & Gutheil, E. (2014). Transported Joint Probability Density Function Modeling of Turbulent Dilute Spray Flows. Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal, 16(2-3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj186

Issue

Section

Articles