Aromatase (CYP19A1) Inhibitory Activity of Coltsfoot (Tussilago farfara L.) Phytochemicals: In Vitro and in Silico Evaluation

Authors

  • Izaz Ahmad Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan; Department of Chemistry, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Lower Dir 18800, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Atif H.E.J. Research Institute of Chemistry, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
  • Gulmaira Aldibekova School of Pharmacy, S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
  • Didara Balpanova School of Pharmacy, S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
  • Humaira Zafar Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
  • Maria Sadia Department of Chemistry, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Lower Dir 18800, Pakistan
  • Mushtaq Ahmad Department of Higher Education Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Govt, College Wari Upper Dir 18200, Pakistan
  • Atia-tul-Wahab Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
  • Bates Kudaibergenova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
  • uhammad Iqbal Choudhary Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan; H.E.J. Research Institute of Chemistry, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan; Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj1678

Keywords:

Anticancer, Aromatase, Natural products, Molecular docking, Exemestane

Abstract

Estrogen plays a critical role in the development and progression of hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Aromatase (CYP19A1), the key enzyme catalyzing the final step in estrogen biosynthesis, has emerged as a promising therapeutic target. Although third-generation synthetic aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are effective, their use is limited by serious side effects, highlighting the need for safer natural alternatives. In this study, we evaluated three major flavonoids from Tussilago farfara L., quercetin-3-rutinoside (1), quercetin-3-O-β-D-glucoside (2), and kaempferol-3-O-glucoside (3) for aromatase inhibitory potential. In vitro assays showed that compound 3 was the most potent (IC50 = 3.46 µM), followed by compound 2 (3.79 µM) and compound 1 (3.81 µM), with activities comparable to potent dietary flavonoids and stronger than some reported natural analogues. Molecular docking supported these findings, showing favourable docking scores (-6.73 to -4.19) and binding energies (-60.3 to -43.7 kcal mol-1), comparable to those of the standard inhibitor exemestane (IC50 = 0.20 µM; -68.3 kcal mol-1). However, the computational predictions did not fully replicate the experimental ranking, reflecting the limitations of docking methods. Overall, these results highlight the significance and therapeutic potential of T. farfara flavonoids as natural aromatase inhibitors.

References

(1) H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R. Siegel, et al., Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA Cancer J Clin. 71 3 (2021) 209–249. Crossref

(2) S.K. Mohamed, Awareness and knowledge toward breast cancer and breast self-examination: A cross-sectional descriptive study among undergraduate female students at Cairo University, Egypt, Malays. J. Nurs. 12 (2021) 111–119. Crossref

(3) J.D. Yager, N.E. Davidson, Estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer, N. Engl. J. Med. 354 (2006) 270–282. Crossref

(4) W.R. Miller, A.P.M. Forrest, Oestradiol synthesis by a human breast carcinoma, Lancet 304 (1974) 866–868. Crossref

(5) A.S. Bhatnagar, A.M.H. Brodie, B.J. Long, et al., Intracellular aromatase and its relevance to the pharmacological efficacy of aromatase inhibitors, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 76 (2001) 199–202. Crossref

(6) D.R.P. Guay, Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer, Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2 (2004) 149–150. Crossref

(7) M. Correia, P. Hollenberg, Inhibition of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes. In: Ortiz de Montellano, P. (eds) Cytochrome P450. Springer, Cham. (2015) 177–259. Crossref

(8) F. Rasha, M. Sharma, K. Pruitt, Mechanisms of endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer, Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 532 (2021) 111322. Crossref

(9) K. Luo, J. Liu, Y. Wang, et al., Associations between organophosphate esters and sex hormones among 6–19-year old children and adolescents in NHANES 2013–2014, Environ. Int. 136 (2020) 105461. Crossref

(10) L. Guo, D. Kong, J. Liu, et al., Breast cancer heterogeneity and its implication in personalized precision therapy, Exp. Hematol Oncol. 12 (2023) 3. Crossref

(11) A.S. Bhatnagar, The discovery and mechanism of action of letrozole, Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 105 (Suppl 1) (2007) 7–17. Crossref

(12) D.J.L. Ghosh, C. Egbuta, Recent progress in the discovery of next generation inhibitors of aromatase from the structure–function perspective, J. Med. Chem. 59 (2016) 5131–5148. Crossref

(13) R.J. Santen, L.M. Demers, J. Lynch, et al., Specificity of low dose fadrozole hydrochloride (CGS 16949A) as an aromatase inhibitor, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 73 (1991) 99–106. Crossref

(14) C.I. Falkson, H.C. Falkson, A randomised study of CGS 16949A (fadrozole) versus tamoxifen in previously untreated postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer, Ann. Oncol. 7 (1996) 465–469. Crossref

(15) A.U. Buzdar, Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of the newer generation aromatase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 9 (2003) 468s-472s. https://aacrjournals.org/clincancerres/article/9/1/468s/289362/Pharmacology-and-Pharmacokinetics-of-the-Newer

(16) J.C. Bailar, H.L. Gornik, Cancer undefeated, N. Engl. J. Med. 336 (1997) 1569–1574. Crossref

(17) A.L. Harvey, R.E. Ebel, R.J. Quinn, The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14 (2015) 111–129. Crossref

(18) C. Liu, H. Wu, L. Wang, et al., Farfarae Flos: A review of botany, traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology, J. Ethnopharmacol. 260 (2020) 113038. Crossref

(19) S. Chen, L. Dong, H. Quan, et al., A review of the ethnobotanical value, phytochemistry, pharmacology, toxicity and quality control of Tussilago farfara L. (coltsfoot), J. Ethnopharmacol. 267 (2021) 113478. Crossref

(20) D.R. Campbell, M.S. Kurzer, Flavonoid inhibition of aromatase enzyme activity in human preadipocytes, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 46 (1993) 381–388. Crossref

(21) C. Wang, T. Mäkelä, T. Hase, H. Adlercreutz, M.S. Kurzer, Lignans and flavonoids inhibit aromatase enzyme in human preadipocytes, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 50 (1994) 205–212. Crossref

(22) H.J. Jeong, Y.G. Shin, I.H. Kim, J.M. Pezzuto, Inhibition of aromatase activity by flavonoids, Arch. Pharm. Res. 22 (1999) 309–312. Crossref

(23) I. Ahmad, B. Kudaibergenova, M. Ahmad, et al., Coltsfoot (Tussilago farfara L.; Asteraceae): modern methods of extraction, phytochemistry, nanoparticles synthesis, ethnopharmacology, and biological activities. Nat Prod Res. (2025). Crossref

(24) H. Li, Y. Zhao, L. Chen, et al., Triclocarban and triclosan inhibit human aromatase via different mechanisms, Biomed Res. Int. (2017) 8284097. Crossref

(25) H. Zafar, R. Anis, S. Hafeez, et al., Identification of Non-steroidal Aromatase Inhibitors via In silico and In vitro Studies, Med. Chem. 19 (2023) 986–1001. Crossref

(26) S.G. Madhavi Sastry, M. Adzhigirey, T. Day, R. Annabhimoju, W. Sherman, Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 27 (2013) 221–234. Crossref

(27) S. Genheden, U. Ryde, The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities, Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 10 (2015) 449–461. Crossref

(28) P. Lagarias, K. Barkan, E. Tzortzini, et al., Insights to the binding of a selective adenosine A3 receptor antagonist using molecular dynamic simulations, MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA free energy calculations, and mutagenesis, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59 (2019) 5183–5197. Crossref

(29) M.I. Choudhary, M. Shaikh, A. Wahab, A. Rahman, In silico identification of potential inhibitors of key SARS-CoV-2 3CL hydrolase (Mpro) via molecular docking, MMGBSA predictive binding energy calculations, and molecular dynamics simulation. Plos one. 15 (2020) e0235030. Crossref

(30) L. Xie, Z. Deng, J. Zhang,et al., Comparison of flavonoid O-glycoside, C-glycoside and their aglycones on antioxidant capacity and metabolism during in vitro digestion and in vivo, Foods 11 (2022) 882. Crossref

(31) G. Macip, P. Garcia‐Segura, J. Mestres‐Truyol, et al., Haste makes waste: a critical review of docking‐based virtual screening in drug repurposing for SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease (M‐pro) inhibition, Med. Res. Rev. 42 (2022) 744–769. Crossref

(32) T. Pantsar, A. Poso, Binding affinity via docking: fact and fiction, Molecules 23 (2018) 1899. Crossref

(33) M. Feher, C.I. Williams, Effect of input differences on the results of docking calculations, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49 (2009) 1704–1714. Crossref

(34) G.L. Warren, C.W. Andrews, A.M. Capelli, et al., A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions, J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006) 5912–5931. Crossref

(35) D. Ramírez, J. Caballero, 2018. Is it reliable to take the molecular docking top scoring position as the best solution without considering available structural data? Molecules 23 (2018) 1035. Crossref

(36) A. Gimeno, M.J. Ojeda-Montes, S. Tomás-Hernández, et al., The light and dark sides of virtual screening: what is there to know? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (2019) 1375. Crossref

(37) L. Pinzi, G. Rastelli, Molecular docking: shifting paradigms in drug discovery, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (2019) 4331. Crossref

(38) S. Megantara, A. Rusdin, A. Budiman, et al., Proving the absence of correlation between molecular docking predictions and in vitro cytotoxicity study in anti-breast cancer drugs development. Preprints. (2024). Crossref

Downloads

Published

26-12-2025

How to Cite

Ahmad, I., Atif, M., Aldibekova , G., Balpanova, D., Zafar, H., Sadia, M., … Choudhary, uhammad I. (2025). Aromatase (CYP19A1) Inhibitory Activity of Coltsfoot (Tussilago farfara L.) Phytochemicals: In Vitro and in Silico Evaluation. Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal, 27(4), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj1678

Issue

Section

Article