Computational Assessment of Pharmacological, Toxicological, and Electronic Properties of Ephedrine Derivatives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj1685Keywords:
Ephedrine, ADMET, PASS prediction, Spasmolytic activity, Analeptic propertiesAbstract
Ephedrine and its derivatives have long been recognized for their therapeutic potential in the treatment of hypotension, asthma, and obesity. However, their use is limited by significant side effects, including cardiovascular risks and toxicity. This study presents a comprehensive computational evaluation of 13 ephedrine derivatives using integrated ADMET analysis, PASS prediction, and quantum-chemical approaches. Pharmacological profiles, toxicity risks, and electronic properties were systematically analyzed to establish structure–activity relationships. Key physicochemical parameters, pharmacokinetic properties, and toxicity risks were analyzed to identify compounds with optimal drug-like characteristics. The results highlight compound 5 as the most promising candidate, demonstrating high drug-likeness (Quantitative Estimate of Drug-likeness, QED = 0.85) and favorable pharmacokinetic properties. Conversely, compounds 3, 11–13 exhibit high toxicity and require structural optimization. PASS predictions indicate diverse biological activities, including spasmolytic and analeptic effects, with compounds 5–7 showing significant potential for further development and compound 13 exhibiting antioxidant activity. DFT analysis of ephedrine, cephedrine and key derivatives (compounds 5, 7, 13) revealed an optimal HOMO-LUMO range (ΔE = 4.7–5.0 eV) for compounds with high activity and low toxicity, where derivative 5 exhibits the best balance. This study underscores the importance of rational drug design in optimizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects and environmental risks.
References
(1) K.K. Chen, C.F. Schmidt, The action and clinical use of ephedrine, J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 15 (1926) 836–842. Crossref
(2) A.S. Dousari, N. Satarzadeh, B. Amirheidari, et al., Medicinal and therapeutic properties of ephedra, Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 32 (2022) 883–899. Crossref
(3) W.A. Wannes, M.S. Tounsi, Phytochemicals, traditional uses, biological effects, and possible molecular mechanisms of Ephedra alata, Future Integr. Med. 2 (2023) 189–199. Crossref
(4) D. Bensky, A. Gamble, Chinese Herbal Medicine: Materia Medica, Eastland Press, Seattle, WA, 1993, p. 1305.
(5) Y. Ding, E. Brand, W. Wang, et al., Licorice: Resources, applications in ancient and modern times, J. Ethnopharmacol. 298 (2022) 115594. Crossref
(6) C. Ai, Y. Zou, H. Liu, et al., Traditional Chinese herbal medicine for allergic diseases: a review, Am. J. Chin. Med. 51 (2023) 779–806. Crossref
(7) D. Jones, Ephedra (Ma-huang); Today and Yesterday: Traditional and Topical Aspects of its Nutritional and Clinical Applications, In: Proceedings of AHPA Ephedra International Symposium, Arlington, VA, December 1999.
(8) S. Choudhary, H. Kaurav, G. Chaudhary, Medicinal importance of Ephedra gerardiana in Ayurveda and modern sciences, Asian J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 7 (2021) 110–117. Crossref
(9) S. Tang, J. Ren, L. Kong, et al., Ephedrae herba: A review of its phytochemistry, pharmacology, clinical application, and alkaloid toxicity, Molecules 28 (2023) 663. Crossref
(10) C.M. Tripathi, S.C. Agarwal, S.K. Basu, Production of L-phenylacetylcarbinol by fermentation, J. Ferment. Bioeng. 84 (1997) 487–492. Crossref
(11) J.O. Westman, P. Ylitervo, C.J. Franzén, et al., Effects of encapsulation of microorganisms on product formation during microbial fermentations, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 96 (2012) 1441–1454. Crossref
(12) N.D. Fabricant, Effect of progressively buffered solution of ephedrine on nasal mucosa, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 151 (1953) 21–25. Crossref
(13) O. Laccourreye, A. Werner, J.P. Giroud, et al., Benefits, limits and danger of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine as nasal decongestants, Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Dis. 132 (2015) 31–34. Crossref
(14) K. Głowacka, A. Wiela-Hojeńska, Pseudoephedrine – benefits and risks, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021) 5146. Crossref
(15) M. Weinberger, L. Hendeles, Theophylline in asthma, N. Engl. J. Med. 334 (1996) 1380–1388. Crossref
(16) T.S. Dnyanadev, M.N.A. Shete, N. Dnyaneshwari, et al., A review on: Ephedrine, Pharmaceutical Resonance 5 (2022) 6–8. URL
(17) S.J. Stohs, M. Shara, S.D. Ray, p-Synephrine, ephedrine, p-octopamine and m-synephrine: Comparative mechanistic, physiological and pharmacological properties, Phytother. Res. 34 (2020) 1838–1846. Crossref
(18) H.J. Yoo, H.Y. Yoon, J. Yee, et al., Effects of ephedrine-containing products on weight loss and lipid profiles: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Pharmaceuticals 14 (2021) 1198. Crossref
(19) R.N. Chopra, B. Mukherjee, Toxic effects of ephedrine – a warning, Ind. Med. Gaz. 68 (1933) 622–626. PMCID: PMC5163782; PMID: 29009428
(20) P. Rakovec, M. Kozak, M. Šebeštjen, Ventricular tachycardia induced by abuse of ephedrine in a young healthy woman, Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 118 (2006) 558–561. Crossref
(21) B.R. Matlaga, O.D. Shah, D.G. Assimos, Drug-induced urinary calculi, Rev. Urol. 5 (2003) 227–231. PMID: 16985842; PMCID: PMC1508366
(22) G.M. Mekhova, A.N. Poskalenko, Effect of the new antidepressant cephedrine on compensatory hypertrophy of the ovaries and the inhibiting effect of estrogen, Farmakol Toksikol. 45 (1982) 52–54. PMID: 7056382
(23) V.G. Pashinskiĭ, T.M. Vysokovskiĭ, Zh.N. Khlienko, et al., Toxicological properties of a cephedrine preparation, Farmakol. Toksikol. 41 (1978) 345–347. PMID: 658386
(24) S. Fogel, Sudden death in asthma, Can. Med. Assoc. J. 114 (1976) 191. PMID: 1032350; PMCID: PMC1956924
(25) B. Li, Z. Wang, Z. Liu, et al., DrugMetric: Quantitative drug-likeness scoring based on chemical space distance, Briefings Bioinf. 25 (2024) bbae321. Crossref
(26) W. Wei, S. Cherukupalli, L. Jing, et al., Fsp³: A new parameter for drug-likeness, Drug Discov. Today 25 (2020) 1839–1845. Crossref
(27) U. Fagerholm, S. Hellberg, J. Alvarsson, et al., Comparing Lipinski’s rule of 5 and machine learning-based prediction of fraction absorbed for assessing oral absorption in humans, bioRxiv preprint (2024). Crossref
(28) T.W. Johnson, K.R. Dress, M. Edwards, Using the Golden Triangle to optimize clearance and oral absorption, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 5560–5564. Crossref
(29) G. Falcón-Cano, C. Molina, M.Á. Cabrera-Pérez, Reliable prediction of Caco-2 permeability by supervised recursive machine learning approaches, Pharmaceutics 14 (2022) 1998. Crossref
(30) P. Shah, V.B. Siramshetty, E. Mathé, X. Xu, Developing robust human liver microsomal stability prediction models: Leveraging inter-species correlation with rat data, Pharmaceutics 16 (2024) 1257. Crossref
(31) A. Faris, I. Cacciatore, R. Alnajjar, et al., Computational insights into rational design and virtual screening of pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives targeting Janus kinase 3 (JAK3), Front. Chem. 12 (2024) 1425220. Crossref
(32) M. Ríos-Gutiérrez, A. Saz Sousa, L.R. Domingo, Electrophilicity and nucleophilicity scales at different DFT computational levels, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 36 (2023) e4503. Crossref
(33) V. Yu, A. Ten, L. Baktybayeva, et al., Synthesis and biological evaluation of 1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione derivatives as myelostimulators, J. Chem. 2018 (2018) 7346835. Crossref







