Droplet-Size Distribution Effects on Urea–Water Spray Evaporation and Decomposition: Knowledge of Sauter Mean Diameter (SMD) is not Sufficient
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj1695Keywords:
NOx reduction, Urea-Water Solution (UWS), Urea decomposition, Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR), Progress variable, Sauter Mean Diameter (SMD)Abstract
Urea water solution is widely used in selective catalytic reduction systems to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions. Urea decomposes via thermolysis and hydrolysis to produce ammonia, which reacts on the catalyst to form non-toxic gases, while solid residues formed during decomposition may affect system performance. A stand-alone reduced model is used to investigate spray decomposition, enabling systematic analysis of droplet size distribution effects independent of full flow-field complexity. The model is based on a progress-variable formulation derived from detailed one-dimensional droplet simulations with comprehensive chemistry over a wide range of temperatures. A parcel-based approach represents arbitrary droplet size distributions. The influence of droplet size, temperature, and distribution shape on ammonia formation and residue production is quantified. Distributions with identical Sauter mean diameter are compared to assess its validity. The results show significant differences in ammonia release and residue formation. These differences are strongly temperature dependent and demonstrate that the Sauter mean diameter alone is insufficient to characterize sprays for accurate decomposition modeling. A strong positive correlation between ammonia production and residue formation is observed. The findings show that representing the full droplet size distribution is essential for accurate prediction of ammonia availability and deposit formation.
References
(1) M. Berglund, Health risk evaluation of nitrogen oxides. Exposure. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 19 (Suppl. 2) (1993) 14–20. PMID: 8209191
(2) S. Sivaramanan, Acid Rain, Causes, Effects and Control Strategies. Central Environmental Authority, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka, 2015, pp. 1–13. Crossref
(3) E. Mulholland, J. Miller, Y. Bernard, et al., The role of NOx emission reductions in Euro 7/VII vehicle emission standards to reduce adverse health impacts in the EU27 through 2050, Transp. Eng. 9 (2022) 100133. Crossref
(4) G. Busca, L. Lietti, G. Ramis, F. Berti, Chemical and mechanistic aspects of the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia over oxide catalysts: A review, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 18 (1998) 1–36. Crossref
(5) J. Girard, R. Snow, G. Cavataio, C. Lambert, The Influence of Ammonia to NOX Ratio on SCR Performance, SAE World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, Michigan, United States, April 16, 2007. Crossref
(6) I. Nova, E. Tronconi. Urea-SCR Technology for deNOx After Treatment of Diesel Exhausts. Springer, 2014. Crossref
(7) B.-C. Choi, Y.K. Kim, W.-N. Jhung, et al., Experimental investigation on melting characteristics of frozen urea–water-solutions for a diesel SCR de-NOx-system, Appl. Therm. Eng. 50 (2013) 1235–1245. Crossref
(8) M. Koebel, M. Elsener, M. Kleemann. Urea-SCR: a promising technique to reduce NOx emissions from automotive diesel engines, Catal. Today 59 (2000) 335–345. Crossref
(9) F. Birkhold, U. Meingast, P. Wassermann, O. Deutschmann. Modeling and simulation of the injection of urea-water-solution for automotive SCR DeNOx-systems, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 70 (2007) 119–127. Crossref
(10) S. Tischer, M. Börnhorst, J. Amsler, et al., Thermodynamics and reaction mechanism of urea decomposition, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 (2019) 16785–16797. Crossref
(11) W. Brack, B. Heine, F. Birkhold, et al., Kinetic modeling of urea decomposition based on systematic thermogravimetric analyses of urea and its most important by-products, Chem. Eng. Sci. 106 (2014) 1–8. Crossref
(12) M. Koebel, E.O. Strutz, Thermal and Hydrolytic Decomposition of Urea for Automotive Selective Catalytic Reduction Systems: Thermochemical and Practical Aspects, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42 (2003) 2093–2100. Crossref
(13) T.L. McKinley, A.G. Alleyne, A Urea Decomposition Modeling Framework for SCR Systems, SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2 (2009) 612–626. Crossref
(14) M. Surendran, T.N.C. Anand, S. Bakshi, Experimental investigation of the evaporation behavior of urea-water-solution droplets exposed to a hot air stream, AIChE J. 66 (2020) e16845. Crossref
(15) S.S. Prabhu, N.S. Nayak, N. Kapilan, V. Hindasageri, An experimental and numerical study on urea-water solution spray impingement and deposit formation in SCR systems. Appl. Therm. Eng. 111 (2017) 1211–1231. Crossref
(16) K. Krum, J. Allingham, S. Poulsen, et al., Modeling the decomposition and byproduct formation of a urea-water-solution droplet, Chem. Eng. Sci. 237 (2021) 116587. Crossref
(17) U. Budziankou, M. Börnhorst, C. Kuntz, et al., Deposit Formation from Urea Injection: a Comprehensive Modeling Approach, Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 6 (2020) 211–227. Crossref
(18) C. Kuntz, P.J. Jägerfeld, J. Mmbaga, et al., Coupling of Liquid and Surface Chemistry in Urea SCR Systems. Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 9 (2023) 77–92. Crossref
(19) A. Chaudhary, P. Ghodake, K. Biswas, Accurate Urea Consumption Prediction in SCR System Using CFD Simulation. SAE Technical Paper, 2024-28-0100 (2024). Crossref
(20) F. Mazari, L. Ganippa, T. Megaritis, Characterization of deposits formed from urea-water-solution droplets under high-temperature engine environment, Fuel 402 (2025) 135987. Crossref
(21) P. Yang, S. Drennan. Predictions of Urea Deposit Formation with CFD Using Autonomous Meshing and Detailed Urea Decomposition. SAE WCX Digital Summit, Live Online, Pennsylvania, United States, April 13, 2021. Crossref
(22) H. Ström, A. Lundström, B. Andersson, Choice of urea-spray models in CFD simulations of urea-SCR systems, Chem. Eng. J. 150 (2009) 69–82. Crossref
(23) V. Ebrahimian, A. Nicolle, C. Habchi, Detailed modeling of the evaporation and thermal decomposition of urea-water solution in SCR systems, AICHE J. 58 (2012) 1998–2009. Crossref
(24) Y. Liao, P.D. Eggenschwiler, D. Rentsch, et al., Characterization of the urea-water spray impingement in diesel selective catalytic reduction systems, Appl. Energy 205 (2017) 964–975. Crossref
(25) M. Stein, V. Bykov, U. Maas, Reduced simulation of the evaporation and decomposition of droplets and films of urea-water solution in exhaust gas environment, Proc. Combust. Inst. 38 (2021) 6687–6694. Crossref
(26) X.-B. Gan, D.W. Yao, F. Wu, et al., Quasi 1D modeling of two-phase flow and deposit formation for urea-selective catalytic reduction systems, J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 17 (2016) 597–613. Crossref
(27) E. Berszány, M. Stein, V. Bykov, U. Maas, An improved reduced model for the evaporation and decomposition of urea-water solution (UWS) droplets, Proc. Combust. Inst. 39 (2023) 4553–4561. Crossref
(28) S. Hareli, V. Bykov, U. Maas. Tabulated reduced model for urea decomposition of urea-water-solution (UWS) sprays. Submitted for publication to International Journal of Engine research. The paper is in submission process.
(29) S.S. Sazhin, Advanced models of fuel droplet heating and evaporation, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 32 (2006) 162–214. Crossref
(30) E. Samuelsson, S. Holmberg, A CFD study of the urea supply, droplet breakup and mixing in a pipe upstream of a SCR catalyst. Master’s thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, 2013. URL
(31) A. Williams. Combustion of Liquid Fuel Sprays. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1990. Crossref
(32) S. Sahu, Y. Hardalupas, A.M.K.P. Taylor, Interaction of droplet dispersion and evaporation in a poly-dispersed spray, J. Fluid Mech. 846 (2018) 37–81. Crossref
(33) Ł.J. Kapusta, M. Sutkowski, R. Rogóż, et al., Characteristics of Water and Urea–Water Solution Sprays, Catalysts 9 (2019) 750. Crossref
(34) R.W. Sellens, T.A. Brzustowski, A prediction of the drop size distribution in a spray from first principles, Atomization and Spray Technology 1 (1985) 89–102.">Crossref
(35) M. Stein, V. Bykov, C. Kuntz, et al., Modeling the decomposition of urea-water-solution in films and droplets under SCR conditions with chemistry in the liquid phase, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 94 (2022) 108936. Crossref
(36) W.A. Sirignano. Fluid Dynamics and Transport of Droplets and Sprays. Cambridge University Press, 1999. Crossref
(37) J.K. Dukowicz, A particle-fluid numerical model for liquid sprays, J. Comput. Phys. 35 (1980) 229–253. Crossref
(38) E. Berszány, M. Stein, V. Bykov, U. Maas, REDIM based model reduction of the decomposition of urea-water-solutions in films and droplets, in: ECCOMAS Congress 2022 – 8th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering. Crossref
(39) U. Maas, J. Warnatz, Ignition processes in hydrogen–oxygen mixtures, Combust. Flame 74 (1988) 53–69. Crossref
(40) H. Huang, L. Zhang, Y. Chen, X. Guo. Study on decomposition and by-products formation mechanism of urea solution impinging on heated plate in SCR system, Chemosphere 309 (2022) 136620. Crossref
(41) X. Chong, Z. Yuanqing, L. Diantao, et al., Investigation on the urea deposits formation in the selective catalyst reduction system of a marine high-power engine, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 171 (2025) 106075. Crossref







