Experimental Observations of Fluidized Beds at High Temperatures

Authors

  • Paola Lettieri BP Chemicals Ltd., Poplar House, Chertsey Road, Sunbury on Thames, Middlesex, TW16 7LL, UK
  • David Newton BP Chemicals Ltd., Poplar House, Chertsey Road, Sunbury on Thames, Middlesex, TW16 7LL, UK
  • John G. Yates Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7JE,UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj342

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to report some experimental observations on the effect of temperature on the fluidization of three fresh FCC catalysts and an equilibrium (E-cat) FCC. The bed collapse test was used as a  quantitative test to characterise the fluidization quality of these materials with increasing temperatures. It provides a sensitive and discriminating means of assessing the changes in the materials’ responses between
low and high temperature fluidization. The standardised collapse time, SCT, was calculated from the collapse
profiles and the experimental values obtained for the FCC catalysts are reported in this paper. The fluidization quality of the fresh FCC catalysts improved with increasing temperature, as indicated by the increase in SCT values. On the other hand, the standardised collapse time of the E-cat FCC decreased with increasing temperature as the catalyst became less aeratable. Changes of the surface properties of this material occurred on increasing temperature. The flow behaviour of the E-cat catalyst was compared with fluidization of a Group C material. The aeratability of this latter material decreased exponentially, due to the dominant role of the interparticle forces over the hydrodynamic forces, with increasing temperature. The use of classical concepts such as the non bubbling ratio, umb/umf, to describe fluidization at low and high temperatures is discussed. Experimental umb/umf values obtained for the fresh FCC catalysts are compared
with predictions.

References

(1). Kunii, D. and Levenspiel, O., Fluidization Engineering, Butterworth-Heinmann, London (1991).

(2). Baerns, M., Ind & Eng. Chem. Fund. 5(4): 508 (1966). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/i160020a013">Crossref</a>

(3). Geldart, D., Powder Technology 7: 285 (1973). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(73)80037-3">Crossref</a>

(4). Clift, R., Powder Technology 72: 199 (1992). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(92)80037-w">Crossref</a>

(5). Foscolo, P.U. and Gibilaro, L.G., Chem. Eng. Sci. 39(12): 1667 (1984). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(84)80100-1">Crossref</a>

(6). Massimilla, L. and Donsi, D., Powder Technology 15(2): 253 (1976). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(76)80054-x">Crossref</a>

(7). Mutsers, S.M.P. and Rietema, K., Powder Technology 18: 239 (1977). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(77)80014-4">Crossref</a>

(8). Lettieri, P., Newton, D. and Yates, J.G., Proc. World Congress on Particle Technology 3, Brighton (1998).

(9). Formisani, B., Girimonte, R. and Mancuso, L., Proc. Fluidization IX, Durango (1998).

(10). Abrahamsen, A.R. and Geldart, D., Powder Technology 26: 35 (1980). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(80)85005-4">Crossref</a>

(11). Xie, H.Y. and Geldart, D., Powder Technology 82: 269 (1995). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(94)02932-e">Crossref</a>

(12). Rapagna’, S., Foscolo, P.U. and Gibilaro, L.G., Int. J. Multiphase Flow 20: 305 (1994). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(94)90084-1">Crossref</a>

(13). Lettieri, P., Newton, D. And Yates, J.G., Proc. AIChE Annual Meeting, Miami (1998).

Downloads

Published

1999-11-10

How to Cite

Lettieri, P., Newton, D., & Yates, J. G. (1999). Experimental Observations of Fluidized Beds at High Temperatures. Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal, 1(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj342

Issue

Section

Articles