Bacterial Cellulose and Pullulan from Simple and Low Cost Production Media

Authors

  • D. Shokatayeva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Ave., 050040, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • L. Ignatova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Ave., 050040, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • I. Savitskaya Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Ave., 050040, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A. Kistaubaeva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Ave., 050040, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A. Talipova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Ave., 050040, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A. Asylbekova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Ave., 050040, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • M. Abdulzhanova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Ave., 050040, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A. Mashzhan Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Ave., 050040, Almaty, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj866

Keywords:

bacterial cellulose, pullulan, exopolysaccharides, industrial wastes

Abstract

In this study, the production rate of both water-insoluble EPS, bacterial cellulose, and water-soluble EPS, P, was improved through сultivation of their producers on a nutrient media containing industrial wastes, and their material properties were analyzed. The growth rate and productivity of Gluconoacetobacter xylinus C3 strain on media with industrial wastes was investigated. An optimal nutrient medium based on molasses was selected for the bacterial cellulose producer. The nutrient medium contains 2% molasses, 1% yeast extract and peptone in a 1: 1 ratio, 0.3% sodium hydrogen phosphate, 0.1% citric acid and 1% ethanol. Cultivation of Gluconoacetobacter xylinus C3 strain on this medium for 7 days at 25–30 °С ensures its high productivity – 8.21 g/L. The composition of the optimized medium with molasses provides high mechanical properties (tensile strength – 37.12 MPa and relative elongation at break – 3.28%) of bacterial cellulose and does not affect the polymer microfibrillar structure. A modified Czapek-Dox medium with 10% molasses and 1% peptone is preferable for the exopolysaccharide accumulation by A. pullulans C8 strain. The optimized media has an advantage over the traditionally used media in terms of the efficiency of exopolysaccharide accumulation and cost reduction. The pullulan yield in media was 10.08 g/l, that is 1.5 times higher than in a standard Czapek-Dox medium. The surface morphology and microstructure of the pullulan samples obtained on different media showed minor changes. Therefore, the replacement of carbon source for molasses in a Czapek-Dox media for pullulan production did not alter the polymer content and viscosity.

References

(1). I.W. Sutherland, Trends Biotechnol. 16 (1998) 41–46. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01139-6

(2). A.S. Kumar, K. Mody, B. Jha, J. Basic Microbil. 47 (2007) 103–117. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200610203

(3). A.M.A. Gallegos, S.H. Carrera, R. Parra, T. Keshavarz, H.M.N. Iqbal, BioResources 11 (2016) 1–15. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.2.Gallegos

(4). S.I. Jeong, S.E. Lee, H. Yang, Y.H. Jin, C.S. Park, Y.S. Park, Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 6 (2010) 370–377. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-010-0049-7

(5). P.R. Chawla, I.B. Bajaj, S.A. Survase, R.S. Singhal, Food Technology and Biotechnology 47 (2009) 107–124.

(6). Sherif M.A.C. Keshk, J. Bioprocess. Biotech. 4 (2014). Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9821.1000150

(7). Faezah Esa, Siti Masrinda Tasirin, Norliza Abd Rahman, Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 2 (2014) 113–119. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2014.11.017

(8). U. Hanif, A. Helder, K. Taous, Cellulose 23 (2016) 2291–2314. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0986-y

(9). K.C. Cheng, A. Demirci, J.M. Catchmark, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 92 (2011) 29–44. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3477-y

(10). F. Hong, K. Qiu, Carbohydr. Polym, 72 (2008) 545–549. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.09.015

(11). A. Kurosumi, C. Sasaki, Y. Yamashita, Y. Nakamura, Carbohydr. Polym 76 (2009) 333– 335. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.009

(12). X. Zeng, D.P. Small, W. Wan, Carbohydr. Polym 85 (2011) 506–513. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.02.034

(13). J.M. Wu, R.H. Liu, Carbohydr. Polym. 90 (2012) 116–121. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.003

(14). A. Vazquez, M.L. Foresti, P. Cerrutti, M. Galvagno, J. Polym. Environ. 21 (2013) 545– 554. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0541-3

(15). Z. Li, L. Wang, J. Hua, S. Jia, J. Zhang, H. Liu, Carbohydr. Polym. 120 (2015) 115–119. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.061

(16). L. Chen, F. Hong, X.X. Yang, S.F. Han, Bioresour. Technol. 135 (2013) 464–468. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.029

(17). A. Cavka, X. Guo, S-J. Tang, S. Winestrand, L.J. Jönsson, F. Hong, Biotechnol. Biofuels 6 (2013) 25. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-25

(18). X. Guo, A. Cavka, L.J. Jönsson, F. Hong, Microb. Cell Fact. 12 (2013) 1–14. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-93

(19). C. Huang, X.Y. Yang, L. Xiong, H.J. Guo, J. Luo, B. Wang, H.R. Zhang, X.Q. Lin, X.D. Chen, Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 60 (2015) 491–496. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12396

(20). S. Wu, Z. Jin, Q. Tong, H. Chen, Carbohydr. Polymer. 76 (2009) 645–649. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.034

(21). C. Barnett, A. Smith, B. Scanlon, C.J. Israilides, Carbohydr. Polymer 38 (1999) 203–209. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(98)00092-7

(22). K. Thirumavalavan, T.R. Manikkadan, R. Dhanasekar, African Journal of Biotechnology 8 (2009) 254–258. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2009.254.258

(23). C. Israilides, B. Scanlon, A. Smith, S.E. Harding, K. Jumel, Carbohydr. Polymer 25 (1994) 203– 209. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(94)90205-4

(24). T. Roukas, Process Biochem. 33 (1998) 805– 810. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00048-X

(25). T. Roukas, World J. Microb. Biot. 15 (1999) 447–450. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008996522115

(26). S.V.N. Vijayendra, D. Bansal, M.S. Prasad, K. Nand, Process Biochem. 37 (2001) 359–364. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00214-X

(27). A.V. Obolenskaya, Z.P. Elnitskaya, A.A. Leonovich, Laboratory work on the chemistry of wood and cellulose, M., 1991, p. 254.

(28). E.A. Skiba, V.V. Budaeva, E.I. Makarova, I.N. Pavlov, V.N. Zolotukhin, G.V. Sakovich, Bulletin of Kazan Technological University 20 (2013) 195–198.

(29). F. Soher, M.S. A. Mohsen, G.M. Manal, I. Hassan, A. Ahmed, Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 7 (2016) 954–969.

(30). T.D. Leathers, G. W. Nofsinger, C. P. Kurtzman, R. J. Bothast, Journal of Industrial Microbiology 3 (1988) 231–239. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569581

(31). D. Mikkelsen, B.M. Flanagan, G.A. Dykes, M.J. Gidley, J. Appl. Microbiol. 107 (2009) 576–583. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04226.x

(32). V.V. Budaeva, E.K. Gladysheva, E.A. Skiba, G.V. Sakovich, Bacterial cellulose preparation method ‒ application for invention, Registration No. 2015129304 from 07.16.2015. DAN.

(33). R.D. Ruka, P.G. Simon, K. Dean, Carbohyd. Polym. 89 (2012) 613–622. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.059

(34). F. Küçükaşik, H. Kazak, D. Güney, I. Finore, A. Poli, O. Yenigün, B. Nicolaus, E.T. Öner, Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 89 (2011) 1729–1740. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-3055-8

(35). F. Jahan, V. Kumar, G. Rawat, R.K. Saxena, Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 167 (2012) 1157–1171. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-9595-x

(36). S. Bielecki, A. Krystynowicz, M. Turkiewicz, H. Kalinowska, Polysaccharides and Polyamide in Food Industry (2005) 31–85

(37). W.C. Lin, C.C. Lien, H.J. Yeh, C.M. Yu, S.H. Hsu, Carbohyd. Polym. 94 (2013) 603–611. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.076

(38). Z. Chi, F. Wang, Z. Chi, L. Yue, G. Liu, T. Zhang, Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 82 (2009) 793– 804. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-1882-2

(39). R. Gaur, R. Singh, S. Tiwari, S.K. Yadav, N.S. Daramwal, J. Appl. Microbiol. 109 (2010) 1035– 1043. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04731.x

(40). K.I. Shingel, Carbohydr. Res. 339 (2004) 447– 460. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2003.10.034

(41). J.H. Kim, M.R. Kim, J.H. Lee, J.W. Lee, S.K. Kim, Biotechnol. Lett. 22 (2000) 987–990. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005681019573

(42). X. H. Duan, Z.M. Chi, L. Wang, X.H. Wang, Carbohyd. Polym. 73 (2008) 587–593. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.12.028

(43). N. Teramato, M. Saitoh, J. Kuroiwa, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 82 (2001) 2273–2280. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2075

(44). S.W. Jung, Y.I. Jeong, S.H. Kim, Int. J Pharmaceut. 254 (2003) 109–121. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00006-1

Downloads

Published

30-09-2019

How to Cite

Shokatayeva, D., Ignatova, L., Savitskaya, I., Kistaubaeva, A., Talipova, A., Asylbekova, A., … Mashzhan, A. (2019). Bacterial Cellulose and Pullulan from Simple and Low Cost Production Media. Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal, 21(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj866

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 3 (2019)

Section

Article
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)